<p>One can never put a price on an authentic Banksy canvas art form. Yet it seems that an increasing number of online auction sites are capitalising on this opportunity to make huge sales online. The main reason for this is due to the increasing vandalism of his works.</p> <p>Destroying partially and fully</p> <p>Banksy canvas art has always been categorised within the Graffiti Art segment. However, this is a tag put forth by persons who dislike his work. These could be anyone from his peers, who do not like the media attention showered on Banksy’s works or anyone from society, who dislikes the messages in his paintings. Many times, a Banksy canvas art piece has been partially destroyed with roller paint. At other times, the entire piece has been chipped off or damaged completely. Thus, in such cases, the work is irretrievably damaged. No rectification work can revive this painting. Given the fact that an increasing number of such paintings are being destroyed these days, Banksy canvas art is becoming more of a rarity.</p> <p>A rare piece</p> <p>In recent times, unscrupulous individuals have destroyed many pieces of Banksy canvas art. Often, the painting is destroyed within a few days of the work painted. This has resulted in many opportunistic people who post pictures of his works online on popular auction sites just to get money from the sale. Since Banksy canvas art is becoming such a rarity, it is natural that admirers of his artwork are lapping up any last pieces of a destroyed work. There have been many times, when the price of a destroyed Banksy painting was close to 150000 to 200000 pounds! Celebrities of the likes of Christina Aguilera have purchased several of his paintings. It is almost as though having a Banksy canvas art painting in your home is like a status symbol.</p> <p>Pieces destroyed</p> <p>In recent times, some of the prominent Banksy canvas art paintings destroyed include the ‘little diver’, ‘chalk ranches maid’ and the ‘mild mild west’ painting. These three paintings have received some of the highest amounts of praise from people across the world. In the case of ‘little diver,’ the painting was destroyed when the protective acrylic glass was damaged. The painting was estimated to be over 400000 pounds in worth, The Banksy canvas art painting called ‘chalk ranches maid’ was destroyed using whitewash. People speculate that rival graffiti artists destroyed his work. In fact, the destroyed piece even had a message written in red, which read ‘all the best – vida’. The ‘mild mild west’ painting was destroyed because of splattering red paint all over the work.</p> <p>Sad but true</p> <p>It is a fact that individuals are destroying many a Banksy canvas art consistently across domestic cleaning london. However, what is sad is that these paintings are not just graffiti. These represent society with a powerful message hidden in them. What is sadder is the fact that instead of replacing the painting with another beautiful image, all that is left is a coat of red paint or whitewash. This is what has appalled the people of domestic cleaning london tremendously.</p>Them. What's sadder by the fact that instead of being replaced now with another beautiful image, all that remains is a coat of paint red or lime. This is something that people are extremely shocked domestic cleaning london. </ P>
Painting of the Sistine Ceiling
The Agony and the Ecstasy, by Carol Reed, depicts Michelangelo as being divinely inspired to create the Chapel. This is depicted in the movie in a scene where Michelangelo is running away from Roman soldiers after he had abruptly halted working on the Chapel. In the scene, Michelangelo is hiding in the mountains near the stone quarry and his inspiration for the ceiling is divinely inspired. Michelangelo, while gazing into the sky, witnesses the clouds take the formation of the scenes that eventually cover the Sistine Chapel ceiling. This divine inspiration seems to be an obvious departure from factual history for the sake of dramatic effect. It seems that Reed’s depiction of Michelangelo’s inspiration being divine is in many ways and insult to Michelangelo. Reed portrays the scene where Michelangelo is inspired with very clear, articulate images within the clouds. This depiction in many ways downplays the role or Michelangelo in the conception of the ideas that became his most famous work.
“The Iconography of the Sistine Ceiling,” brings the inspiration of Michelangelo as something dramatically different then Reed’s depiction. Malcomb Bull in many ways is looking at Michelangelo’s work very narrowly. He describes specific sections as having very specific meanings. It seems that while Reed stretches to make Michelangelo’s inspiration emotionally appealing, Bull stretches to make it intellectually appealing. Bull leaves out any room for randomness. Many of the connections throughout the various painted scenes are surely inevitable, based on the fact that Michelangelo painted all nine main scenes based all on the same book: Genesis. Bull tries to place great significance on the placement of the individual paintings, however arguably, the paintings are placed in chronological order. While it is certainly apparent that a great deal of iconology exists within the paintings, it is a stretch to say that all of the iconology was intentional, and even more of a stretch to say that the painting was planned with the iconology in mind.
Both “The iconography of the Sistine Ceiling” and The Agony and the Ecstasy have certain insights into Michelangelo’s approach to painting the Sistine Chapel ceiling. It seems that the most logical explanation to Michelangelo’s inspiration comes as a combination of both Reed and Bull’s depictions. Michelangelo certainly utilized a great deal of iconology in his painting. This required a great depth of theological founding for the chosen subject. This iconology would certainly lay claims to Bull’s beliefs. At the same time, a certain amount of creative inspiration was needed on the behalf of Michelangelo.
While the idea of that inspiration being divinely inspired may seem like a stretch, a separate seemingly unrelated portion of The Agony and the Ecstasy may be relevant to Michelangelo’s work on the chapel. This section of the movie is the part where Michelangelo receives a new piece of granite, looks at the large stone for a while, and then proclaims that it will be a statue of Moses. Michelangelo sees it as freeing the figure within. This part in many ways may have relevance towards Michelangelo’s inspiration when choosing the subject matter of the ceiling. It is quite apparent that Michelangelo thought very philosophically about his art work, and maybe for him, painting was simply bringing to life an image that already existed; even if only in his mind. While neither Bull nor Reed can fully satisfy how Michelangelo approached the painting of the Sistine Ceiling, when combining the two depictions they compliment each other in order to piece together a fairly adequate idea of Michelangelo’s inspiration.